Phil Hellmuth
Phil Hellmuth is an all-time poker great. With just shy of $24 million in career earnings and a record 15 World Series of Poker bracelets, it is hard to argue that his career won’t be regarded as one of the best in history.
As more time elapses between the current environment and the Chris Moneymaker-inspired poker boom of 2003, however, his ability relative to the game’s best is a point of heated debate.
Phil Hellmuth, Katherine’s husband Personal life Katherine is married to Phillip Jerome Hellmuth who is known for being an American professional poker player – ironically, Phil is known to act insane when the situation at the table is not as he would want it to be, and although Katherine is a psychiatrist, she can’t help him to control. Hellmuth is the all-time World Series of Poker bracelet leader with 15. He is also the all-time World Series of Poker leader in cashes and holds several other significant WSOP records. Known as the 'Poker Brat' for his temperament at the table, particularly after taking a bad beat. Hellmuth has made several instructional poker videos, including his Ultimate White To Black Belt Course and Phil Hellmuth's Million Dollar Poker System. He is a married man and married to Katherine Sanborn. She is a psychiatrist at Stanford University. The couple has been blessed with two sons named, Philip III and Nicholas. Phil Hellmuth in the World Series of Poker Tournaments. In 1989, when he was only 24 years old, Phil won the Main Event at the World Series of Poker. By defeating the two-time defending champion Johnny Chan in heads up play, Phil became the youngest to win the said event. However, in 2008, his record was broken by Peter Eastgate.
Given his age and background, high-stakes pro and poker site operator Phil Galfond, tweeted a somewhat controversial opinion of Hellmuth Tuesday evening.
In Galfond’s opinion, Hellmuth actually has some chops.
Before the Moneymaker boom there was less math used in developing strategies. Hellmuth was clearly one of the best in the world while using a much more exploitative, feel-based strategy than many top pros implement today. As the game evolved and high roller events emerged, it became clear that the players in those tournaments had much less respect for his game.
Galfond revealed four screenshots of his phone’s notepad, elaborating on his thoughts of Hellmuth’s recent heads-up play against Antonio Esfandiari on PokerGO’s “High Stakes Duel.” It is one of the rare times that a player of Galfond’s age and caliber has outwardly praised Hellmuth’s poker ability.
We so often criticize the plays we see on TV from the comfort of our couches. I think it’s only fair to also give credit where credit is due.
I recently watched phil_hellmuth</a> on <a href='https://twitter.com/PokerGO?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw'>PokerGO’s #HighStakesDuel & wrote down some thoughts. pic.twitter.com/AEOVEeczZQ
— Phil Galfond (@PhilGalfond) October 7, 2020
Many of the game’s best base their decisions off what is the correct Game Theory Optimal [GTO] play. GTO is heavily based in mathematics and requires lots of studying. Players who use this strategy generally end up with an understanding how often a certain hand should take specific actions and how to randomize play to prevent getting exploited by their opponents.
Hellmuth doesn’t really ascribe to that method. He’s still an old-school, feel player at his core. He infamously described his game as using “white magic” to pinpoint what his opponents’ hole cards were.
“What I saw wasn’t HUNL technical mastery,” wrote the three-time bracelet winner in one of his screenshots. “It was an uncanny ability to assess and adapt to every spot he found himself in. Specifically, in the second match, Phil’s reads on each and every hand were incredible, and he chose lines that, while often unorthodox, intelligently capitalized on his (dead-on) read of each situation.”
The 35-year-old went on to apologize for not recognizing Hellmuth’s game earlier and said that he would “promise” to respect his game moving forward.
Phil Hellmuth Bracelets
“I just recognize that I witnessed greatness, and that Phil Hellmuth knows something I don’t,” Galfond said to close his thoughts.
Galfond is as close to universally loved and respected in the poker world as possible. He’s regarded as one of the best to ever play the game, has played the highest stakes cash games and tournaments in the world, and recently transitioned to the business side of the game, opening his own online poker site.
However, his tweet drew scrutiny from several high roller regulars.
On your side of the argument, people have some nice things to say. The people on the other side of the argument are willing to bet really big.
Hmm…. https://t.co/FwJDv4SStk
— Dan Smith (@DanSmithHolla) October 7, 2020
He punted every 300k I’ve seen him play in so I don’t share your view I think he’s a clear losing player in tougher lineups and mostly plays a style that exploits vs. tighter weaker opponents and WSOP & oldschool player tendencies.
I find it entertaining to play against him.
— Fedor Holz (@CrownUpGuy) October 7, 2020
Easily 1 of the silliest things I’ve ever read from someone I respect. Misses the point or is flat out wrong on almost every substantive issue and an actual formal apology to the most obnoxious disrespectful, self promoting ego maniac in the industry. It’s like Stockholm syndrome
— Olivier Busquet (@olivierbusquet) October 7, 2020
According to the high-roller crowd, Hellmuth can’t beat those games, which means he can’t possibly be considered one of the best in the world.
Poker legend Doyle Brunson chimed in on the issue and said that they were right, but it was irrelevant given how much Hellmuth was able to win off of lesser players. Regardless of how Hellmuth won the money, it still ended up in his pocket. It was that skill set that allowed him to win a WSOP bracelet 15 times.
I thought everybody knew that about Phil. He is the worlds best getting bad players on tilt and throwing their money at him. That's why he has 15 bracelets. Yeah, he has always struggled against tough tables. So what? $$$ https://t.co/y1tPOa568A
— Doyle Brunson (@TexDolly) October 7, 2020
After seeing the pushback, Galfond clarified his thoughts Wednesday morning.
I don't even know if I'm making an argument, & certainly not one that can be bet on.
My opinion is that PH is very talented & that he has abilities that others don't.
I also think @TexDolly is the greatest of all time, but that doesn't mean I want his action in $100k MTTs. https://t.co/VwZPM47lm4
— Phil Galfond (@PhilGalfond) October 7, 2020
In what is rapidly becoming the format du jour for poker players to demonstrate their prowess, 15-time World Series of Poker champion Phil Hellmuth completed his domination of fellow pro Antonio Esfandiari. Making “The Magician” “disappear,” Hellmuth finished off by winning three consecutive matches and, in the final match, $400,000.
PokerGO Program What Poker World Needs
The format of the new PokerGO show High Stakes Duel served as the backdrop for the Hellmuth/Esfandiari matchup. The basic premise is that both players put up $50,000 each (to start with) and play until one or the other has the other’s stack. They then can move on to the next match, with the buy-in doubled ($100,000). If a player wants to quit, then another player can step into the match and continue at the stakes as they are currently running.
Phil Hellmuth Education
Hellmuth dominated the first two matchups between the duo (and $300,000), meaning that he was basically playing the third match with Esfandiari’s money. That put a great deal of pressure on “The Magician,” but Hellmuth was feeling some heat about his play, too. Thus, both players had a great deal to prove when they stepped to the felt for Wednesday’s broadcast.
The PokerGO cameras caught all the action and, in many ways, it seemed that Hellmuth was never challenged. It seemed as if Hellmuth would use that “white magic” he repeatedly speaks about to see through Esfandiari’s eyes, picking off bluffs from the first champion of the “Big One for One Drop.” When he wasn’t soul-reading Esfandiari, he had the cards to do the job, bettering Esfandiari’s holdings at every turn.
The final hand saw Hellmuth’s A-10 up against an all-in Esfandiari’s A-3. While it appeared the board was on the way to a chop for the duo, Hellmuth’s fortunes would hold true and he would take the final hand when his ten played. After the conclusion of the match, Hellmuth let Esfandiari off the hook and resigned from the battle, taking his $400,000 won from Event #3 and going home, while Esfandiari got out to review just what went wrong.
Who Is Up Next?
There are four more episodes of High Stakes Duel left, but the players aren’t known yet. This would have been a great forum for the Negreanu/Polk battle and the time is working out roughly around the start of their much anticipated tete a tete battle on November 1. But, with that one going on virtually, it might not lend itself well to the PokerGO cameras.
So, who else is a possibility?
There are a few heads-up masters that could be choices for this series. Olivier Busquet, who was one of the voices that raged against Hellmuth’s play, could step in for a battle. Another player such as Chris Moorman is a possibility but, depending on his current location, he might not be able to get in the U. S. to play. Chance Kornuth and Phil Galfond are also good choices, but their ongoing “Galfond Challenge” might keep them otherwise occupied.
Cached
Credit to PokerGO for getting on some original programming, especially when there is very little tournament poker being conducted, and kudos to Hellmuth and Esfandiari for putting on such a good show (Esfandiari might not think it was so fun, however). It will be interesting to see who the next two combatants are for High Stakes Duel and what the future of the program will be (Hellmuth has already said he’d be up to do the premiere of a potential Season 2).